The bickering, backstabbing and pseudo-intellectual debate of student socialism.

Tuesday, June 27, 2006

Waking up bit by bit...

I haven’t posted in a while because the world of student politics seems to have entered a lull. But seeing as I just missed the only thing NUS are doing at this moment I thought this momentous day shouldn’t go unmarked. Because today on the same day as NUS and the teaching unions launch their “Public Services Not Private Profit” campaign Blair has decided to come clean as being a Tory all along. Worshiping the right of the Individual to get rich and highlighting the privatising agenda in Secondary education. Is there any more obvious way to slap us and the Unions in the face?

At a speech to the British Society of Magazine Editors which must have been happening just as NUT reps from across the country filing into Westminster Blair outlined his agenda for business friendly secondary schools based on New Labours “choice agenda.” One of the most sickening things (as History is dropped to “an option” in the secondary curriculum) is the comment that,
"One of the things we are doing with specialist schools and trust schools is have schools where enterprise and business becomes very much a greater part of what kids are taught from an early age.”
Echoing horribly the comments at the launch of a recent University of Manchester project about “providing a generation of professionals capable of bring private enterprise to the public sector.” The gearing of the entire sector has been gathering pace for a while with the gradual erosion of “soft” subjects such as art, drama and history but this seems to mark a turning point with Labour determined after ramming through the Education and Inspections bill through the commons. The whole fiasco has been labelled by the press as Blair encouraging entrepreneurialism which is in itself sickening without Labour is dismantling the remaining legacies of comprehensive education. Brown is getting in on the act as well with his summer schools for entrepreneurs as part of “enterprise week” - no I’m not making this up. Even when you expect it you still want to weep for their unashamed worship of the market and business. Apparently Brown is proud to say that at the 97 election 5% of schools offered education on business matters and this has now increased to 50% as business courses at Universities swelled.

The only reason I’m going on about this other then missing the lobby is the horrible parallels between this and what is happening in Manchester. Privatisation or more accurately the “modernisation agenda” has slowly dominated our University while the left was distracted and while the leadership of our Students Union was dining with the Vice Chancellor. The Universities 2015 agenda is solely based on the premise of providing “centres of excellence” to industry. The nuclear research based Dalton Institute being only one among many examples of a project where the education of students was considered as an after thought to the needs of the North West’s least pleasant industry.

Things have been picking up with the Campaign Against the Arms Trade disinvestments campaign opening up a series of debates in the student population about how our University is funded. Similar campaigns against Halls sell offs and Nuclear research have started to merge in a way which is generalising out when the lecturers strike brought the question of education funding to a head. I almost started this earlier with a moan about predicting the moment when things will kick off again in the student movement but realised that we don’t have much in the way of reasons to complain. We still have an active anti-war movement and the combination of privatisation starting to pinch and the Labour Party conference up the road could be just one of many sparks creating a real campaign for education.


At 12:12 AM, Blogger A soft socialist said...

Hmm, comrade Adele agrees with mch of what SWP member says shock!

I agree with what you say at Manchester, however when we do things the right way we can fight privatisation that is bad for students. Special mention for Gemma and Rob for their work in that.

Maybe someone can tell me why AMICUS and UNISON weren't at the public services lobby. I'm not sure I agree with a rigid belief in the public sector; but I agree that the Govnt are not delivering on services at the mo.

In terms of NUS, with one Mr Streeting at the helm, I think the campaign will be excellent next year.

Don't get too hung up about the NOLS factor.

At 9:45 PM, Blogger morbo said...

"In terms of NUS, with one Mr Streeting at the helm, I think the campaign will be excellent next year."

Ugh, I feel sick, he *is* the next Tony Blair

At 2:06 PM, Blogger A soft socialist said...

Slight difference with their views on how to fund education.

At 1:04 AM, Blogger El Tom said...

Good thing the Halls profiteers have been seen off now. That was as much to do with certain strata of university management as anything else. There are people in there who agree with students on privatisation.

At 9:10 AM, Blogger Cliffite said...

I think that had more to do with the auditors assesment of market control by the Uninversity then overall sympathy. Making it a high profile issue with the student population will undeniably have increased the pressure though.

At 11:15 PM, Blogger El Tom said...

indeed. housing co-op idea needs a good push too.

At 8:47 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...









Post a Comment

<< Home